# FXPool Final Audit

#### PeckShield Audit

\
The review focused on the FXPool contract that was built on top of Balancer's v2 Vault. There were 5 issues (1 critical, 1 low, 1 information and 2 mediums) pointed out during the audit review. These issues have been resolved. Please refer to our Audit Report on PeckShield github [here](https://github.com/peckshield/publications/blob/master/audit_reports/PeckShield-Audit-Report-Xave-v1.0.pdf)

{% file src="<https://2822860750-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2F6utITMNjJXVJJVMgUpbZ%2Fuploads%2FLQAXXEvpoWMKI7r6OS5M%2FPeckShield-Audit-Report-Xave-v1.0.pdf?alt=media&token=d6ccde5c-a0b9-4973-ad97-e52873a6504f>" %}

#### Akira Tech Audit

Akira Tech's audit focused on manually reviewing the codebase, searching for security issues such as, but not limited to, re-entrancy problems, transaction ordering, block timestampdependency, exception handling, call stack depth limitation, integer overflow/underflow, self-destructible contracts, unsecured balance, use of origin, costly gas patterns, architectural problems, code readability.\
\
Issues were closed on the updated version of the FXPool contract.

{% file src="<https://2822860750-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2F6utITMNjJXVJJVMgUpbZ%2Fuploads%2FTYQRLx7EbvMNno8HoNxI%2FAkira-Tech-Audit-Report.pdf?alt=media&token=80822449-2549-4777-b678-d724d8defd8d>" %}